All Posts

. . . DOGE’s rapid implementation and the ensuing legal tumult reflect a bold reimagining of federal efficiency reforms, diverging from...

. . . If audits show misuse (e.g., inflated grants), forcing payments could violate the executive’s duty to execute laws faithfully . ....

. . . What remains to be seen is whether the Supreme Court ultimately will rule that the confinement of that executive power to...

. . . this case presented the distinct question of whether a Board determination that certain claims are unpatentable can collaterally...

. . . So the government’s theory that civil asset forfeiture is “pardon proof” remains untested and unresolved . . . . I. Introduction ...

. . . Viewed in this light, the court’s extended analysis of “drug” versus “device” components of an approved drug product may thus...

. . . On appeal, the Federal Circuit upheld the Board’s determination that background prior art like Cline could not supply a missing...

. . . “ These add-ons are for accessory items, not the basic necking machine itself . . . .” Introduction In Crown Packaging Technology,...

. . . The Federal Circuit explained how these two cases provide important guideposts . . . . In Cytiva BioProcess R&D AB v. JSR Corp....

. . . In other words, silence is not disclosure and fails to provide sufficient support for a negative claim limitation . . . . ...

. . . These issues appear to be questions of first impression in Japan, the resolution of which will significantly shape the scope and...

本件において、ネバダ州連邦地方裁判所は、クラップスのディーラーであるWendell Olk氏の主張を認め、トーク（toke）はディーラーにとって課税所得ではなく、非課税の「幸運の神々への捧げもの（tributes to the gods of fortune）」であると判示した。 はじめに：舞台設定 2024年の大統領選挙が迫る中、思いがけない論点が政治の舞台に再浮上した。チップ所得への課税である。主要な両候補がいずれもこの課税の廃止を主張しており、数百万人に及ぶ米国の労働者に広範な影響を及ぼすこの議論への関心が高まっている。しかし、これは新しい議論ではない。チップ課税をめぐる争いには深い歴史的根があり、とりわけラスベガスのカジノ業界では、1970年代以来この問題をめぐる小さな「内戦」がくすぶり続けてきた。自らの「トーク（toke）」受領分への課税の廃止を求めるカジノ・ディーラーたちによって繰り広げられてきたこの争いは、税の歴史における興味深く、かつ今なお続く一章である。 カジノ業界において、「トーク」はサービス従業員が受け取る通常の

. . . Indeed, the doctrine was established to fulfill a purpose related to, but distinct from, claim preclusion . . . . Introduction ...

. . . In this case, the district court was confronted with just such a situation. There was no dispute that the asserted ’356 patent had...

. . . There, the Supreme Court held that “when Congress reenacted the same [on-sale] language in the AIA, it adopted the earlier judicial...

. . . The Federal Circuit emphasized that the district court’s “blanket rejection of the unlawful use defense” was unfounded . . . . ...

. . . In such circumstances, sealing the indictment “would undermine the purpose of having a statute of limitations at all.” Introduction...

. . . " The Federal Circuit rejected that assertion noting that Mobile Acuity’s alleged “inventive concept” is merely “part of the...

Noting that the patent license expressly granted Ridge the exclusive right to make, use, and sell . . . , the Federal Circuit instead...

… According to the district court, the “mere possibility” of reverse engineering could not defeat Insulet’s trade secret claims, and...